الأحد، 22 مايو 2011

jeff dunham achmed pictures

jeff dunham achmed pictures. jeff+dunham+and+achmed+jr
  • jeff+dunham+and+achmed+jr

  • leekohler
    Apr 27, 12:51 PM
    Obviously taking everything out of context, when we are dealing with the bleeding obvious there is no reason not to suggest it. I watched the video before reading the comments, so your point has no substance.

    Are you a doctor? Were you there? No?

    Then you are speculating.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff+dunham+achmed+jr
  • Jeff+dunham+achmed+jr

  • AndroidfoLife
    Apr 13, 03:16 PM
    Fact is apple Does not like to play by the rules. They want to have their products run on different accessories and what not. Apple does not believe in some of the other common things such as Blu-ray. Will piss you off when the standard wall mounts do fit and you have to buy the apple ones that cost 55% more. Basically Apple will not want to play with the other manufacturers not be the ones with universal remote codes. Be the company that doesn't place HDMI out on the TV because they don't believe 7.1 surround sound is worth anything.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. JeffDunham-
  • JeffDunham-

  • Eldiablojoe
    Apr 29, 04:03 PM
    What a sad post.
    Nice deflection. You've been on the offensive out of the gate in this game. I don't know what your h*rd-on is for me this game, but apparently I appear a good victim in your eyes. You've played these games a long time, and are a very good player, you know exactly how to tweak things to your advantage and this unusual hardball manner you're playing this game is telling.

    Game play aside, I hope you're okay- in the offline world.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. jeff dunham - lt;bgt;achmed
  • jeff dunham - lt;bgt;achmed

  • Hastings101
    May 3, 11:27 PM
    I wonder why they've moved it to a later date?


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff+dunham+achmed+jr
  • Jeff+dunham+achmed+jr

  • mandis
    Apr 13, 04:55 PM
    It will probably cost twice the price of the equivalent LG/Samsung and at first will only offer half the features.:rolleyes:

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham Achmed quot;Jingle
  • Jeff Dunham Achmed quot;Jingle

  • zenvision
    Oct 24, 09:33 AM
    I do not have a practical answer for you, but I had a similar question when I was upgrading the HD in my powerbook - I wanted the fastest drive I could afford as this would give my PB the biggest performance boost. What I found out is that the 160GB 5400 perpendicular drives have about 90-95% the performance throughput of a non-perpendicular 7200 drive. The reason being that because the bit are perpendicular, the drive needs to rotate a shorter amount to read the same amount of data. I know at the microscopic size of the data on the drives this seems hard to believe, but logically, it makes sense to me. My PB is a screamer by comparison to the 4200 drive that was in there, which has not bearing to your question of course...

    I suspect, that the 5400 160GB drive from Apple will have decent performance. Personally, I'm not impressed with the 4200 200GB offering, but for someone who needs more space and ultimate performance is not key, then this would be fine.

    That all being said, I look forward to finding out the specs & models of the actual drives Apple is putting in the new MBP's before I'd put money down on one.


    thanks for the info! sounds like the 5400 160gb drive is the one for me... :)


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham and his
  • Jeff Dunham and his

  • rdowns
    Oct 19, 01:35 PM
    "Dump" huh? Methinks you don't trade stocks much. It's up over 6% now. Analysts = a dime a dozen.:rolleyes:

    At a dime, they are overpriced, just like Macs. :D

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. jeff dunham and achmed Jeff
  • jeff dunham and achmed Jeff

  • Truffy
    Mar 31, 11:08 AM
    This looks good. Are people forgetting how rubbish iCal is at the moment. Beyond aesthetics, I'd like a calendar that is useful....
    Making it look different won't make it better. They should address the usability/functionality, sure.


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham – Achmed the Dead
  • Jeff Dunham – Achmed the Dead

  • Windowlicker
    Jul 28, 08:26 AM
    It's too late for Microsoft - they are just riding Apple's coattails now, in a desperate attempt to create something that can compete with iTunes+iPod...but thats all it is, a desperate attempt :eek:

    Remember MS has a big pile of cash for marketing and windows install base is also huge. So this product will probably succeed in a way or another.

    Is it gonna beat iPod? Who knows, but it will be hard.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham Catch the
  • Jeff Dunham Catch the

  • alent1234
    Apr 29, 02:44 PM
    can anyone tell me why this market is so important? even at .99 cents a song the margins for the retailer can't be that much.


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. for jeff dunham achmed
  • for jeff dunham achmed

  • halledise
    Feb 26, 01:43 PM
    the guy's an overpaid idiot.

    and at least Mel Gibson can act �

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham - Achmed the Dead
  • Jeff Dunham - Achmed the Dead

  • Mr. Retrofire
    Apr 15, 02:27 PM
    App Sandboxing? Since when does Lion do that??

    Even 10.4, 10.5 and 10.6 do that, IIRC.


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Comedy Central Achmed quot;Amiga
  • Comedy Central Achmed quot;Amiga

  • FX4568
    Apr 19, 04:27 PM
    I had to finally register to comment on the hypocrisy in this and many other threads like it. Because some people want frame rates for gaming on an MBA, then your needs for GPU performance are valid, and others who don't game but could use CPU performance have invalid needs? Rubbish.

    A perfect example is the above. So the C2D rates as a 100/100 for CPU performance and thus any improvement is useless? Really?! Nice to see that you framed the argument such that any improvement you don't see as needed is useless.

    On Sunday I combined 6 or 8 short 720p video clips into a 7 minute video for YouTube with a simple title screen and transitions. It took the C2D ~40 minutes to process the video and save in a new format. So you're really going to argue that there is nothing to be gained from a significant bump in processor speed?

    For me and many other potential MBA purchasers, a CPU bump from the media processing abilities of the Core i processors would be welcome, and GPU performance over and above the ability to play real-time HD video is useless. We shouldn't be saddled with an out-of-date processor or forced to subsidize "unnecessary" frame rate performance just to appease game-players. And that perspective is as valid as yours.

    Well, I shall say first of all, welcome to the MacRumors forum :) I believe CPU is important to the computer as the GPU is. As current computers are, CPU have set a milestone where most users are not even able to use 100% of the capabilities hidden in such a powerful processor.

    Now, you were complaining I used 100/100 in the CPU analogy? fine, I will change it. CPU will be 90/100 and GPU is 80/100 as the 30% increase in cpu and 30% decrease in gpu, we will see a difference of 117/100 and 56/100. Am I arguing that there will be nothing to be gained from a bump in processor speed? Definitely not! Who doesnt love the little extra power when we need it? Who doesnt want the latest in tech? What im saying is that the downgrading of the GPU outweights the upgrading of the CPU in terms of OVERALL performance.

    Futhermore HT and Turbo dont work 100% of the times.
    For you and many other potential MBA purchasers, a CPU bump will be indeed welcomed. But as of me and the I believe majority of MBA owners and will be owners, the difference of processor speed is negligible to a certain extent, but the performance lack of GPU will be noticed the moment we start using the Macbook Air.

    +1, besides, the 13" MBP + 128GB SSD provide far better value-for-money than any present 13" MBA.

    The cheaper solution, the 11", tells another story but even then anything past the base model comes so close to the price of a 13" MBP+SSD that it's impractical to get a 11" from a performance point of view, especially when it's equipped with the slow 1.4 C2D. The 1.4 i5 will provide far better performance (certainly far more than 40% of speed boost). We will still be able to watch FullHD movies despite the less capable IGP. Games. Don't tell me you want to play WoW on a 11" monitor.

    FX4568 said "We have enough to accomplish our tasks, and any more would be an overkill in the things we need our computer to process.". Overkill means the increased processor speed will not be of any use, or, in other words, useless.

    You are comparing a cheaper price point by bringing a 128 SSD into the game. You must understand that even though many people have to choose between the 13 MBA and 13 MBP, both of them are made for a different purpose. You can play WoW on a 11" monitor. Why do you chain your MBA to tasks that you only think it will be able to accomplish.

    Okay, sorry about my lack of further explanation, but I dont want this to sound personal, but what you are doing is taking my statement to a whole different level. I would like to infer that your intelligence would be above the mark where I dont have to expand on every single statement that I say. When I say that the C2D is enough to accomplish tasks, I am saying that it is good enough for the higher than average person. Handbrakers of course will face a time difference on the processor speed, but as many of us know, not everyone uses Handbrake, and if we do, it is not something we do daily. Processor speed is always welcome, but at the sacrifice of GPU from 320m to the Intel GPU is the difference between the ability to play Crysis on 19.3 FPS at Medium settings and not be able to playing it at all while the performance increase in CPU is the difference between 10-30 minutes in Handbrake.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham#39;s Achmed Funny
  • Jeff Dunham#39;s Achmed Funny

  • rhett7660
    Mar 10, 10:09 PM
    I have stayed out of this one for a while, but now he has gone from "sick" to "awesome" with this video on Funny or Die.


    Wow. Dude has seriously lost it me thinks.


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Photographs gt; Jeff Dunham
  • Photographs gt; Jeff Dunham

  • dextertangocci
    Jul 12, 02:59 PM
    It's would be fun if Microsoft released this player and Apple introduced the rumored full screen iPod a few days later..


    Or a few days earlier.....

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham and Achmed the.
  • Jeff Dunham and Achmed the.

  • Moyank24
    Apr 25, 10:01 PM
    Well, would you at least make me a condolence PB&J?

    I blame Appleguy for this. I have sold the sandwich shop. No sandwiches for anyone anymore!!


    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Jeff Dunham Achmed
  • Jeff Dunham Achmed

  • ptysell
    Apr 29, 03:58 PM

    Apple plays by the rules and gets screwed on their music contracts.
    Amazon says screw the music labels and gets a better price.

    I love how people make the argument that the labels hate Apple because of its "control". I hate to break it to ya but Amazon gives them the middle finger time and time again.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. Check out Jeff Dunham#39;s other
  • Check out Jeff Dunham#39;s other

  • QCassidy352
    Sep 30, 09:54 AM
    That is unacceptable. But I'll also say that the problems experienced by people in NYC and SF have created a negative perception of AT&T that isn't accurate for most of the country. I've taken my iphone to a lot of places (to name a few: Orlando, DC, Indianapolis, New Hampshire, Maine, Houston) and had very good service (by which I mean as good as what my gf has had on her verizon phone) everywhere. I live in Boston, and the 3G speeds could be faster, but I do always have 3G and have very few dropped calls.

    None of this is to suggest 30% dropped calls in a major city is Ok - it's clearly not, and if I lived in NYC or SF, I probably wouldn't have an iphone. But I wouldn't hesitate to recommend AT&T to people who lived in most other places.

    jeff dunham achmed pictures. terrorist – Jeff Dunham
  • terrorist – Jeff Dunham

  • Psilocybin
    Apr 18, 10:03 AM
    This one goes out to all the tinfoil hat wearers....you know who you are (secret code inserted here.-..-11..-312).

    I think Apple intentionally borked our current 320M graphic power in the 10.6.7 release fiasco. This was intentional. That way when they release the new MBA's with the inferior integrated graphics chipset, they can actually show an IMPROVEMENT in graphic speed.

    Seriously. Its true. I read it on the intrawebs.

    anyone test 320m in lion?

    Apr 15, 03:07 PM
    Goes against Steve Jobs saying Lion was shipping this summer. What is your source ?

    Until Apple says it's delayed, I'll believe Apple when they say it ships this summer.

    just so you know, summer begins june 21 and ends sept 23 this year. so even it it comes out sept 22, its still a summer release.

    Mar 11, 11:41 PM
    The ballooning lines sucks. It happened at the Spectrum too. We were talking about how the line was getting wider the closer it got to 5pm. Obviously many people holding a place for others. It sucks but that's the way these things go.

    It's interesting as it seems like the common theme here is that there weren't enough of the at&t models to go around. Someone in our line said that a local at&t store only had 10 iPads in stock for the line.

    Pre-orders Apple! Pre-orders!

    Jul 24, 09:27 PM
    fantastic idea if pulled off correctly. I can't wait.

    Apr 13, 01:59 PM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

    It's going to have to outperform the ATV2 by leaps and bounds for me to purchase it. Sounds cool if it does and comes in at a reasonable price point though.

    Apr 25, 08:32 PM
    Plutonius just for the fun of it haha...

    ليست هناك تعليقات:

    إرسال تعليق